David Davis's basic argument is fundamentally flawed: He talks of how Parliament has nobly defended the freedom of people for centuries, until a Labour Government this week supported detention of terror suspects for a maximum 42 days without charge...
Firstly, didn't David Davis himself vote to increase the maximum detention period to 28-days just a couple of years ago...?
Why was he in favour of an increase to four weeks then, but six weeks now suddenly becomes an issue to force a by-election over...?Secondly, at different times in our history, British governments have implemented internment - and with none of the protections for the individual which were enshrined in this week's measures.
Has David Davis forgotten that in 1971, British Prime Minister
Ted Heath approved the rounding-up and
indefinite jailing of hundreds of British citizens
without trial and
without charge?In 1971, MPs like Mr Davis weren't given a vote on the issue as he was this week. Not even a debate in Parliament.
Just an
executive announcement - after more than 300 men had already been detained indefinitely in dawn raids.
This certainly was an 'erosion of freedoms' and it happened under a British Prime Minister of the same political party as David Davis...
Incidentally, it was a Labour Home Secretary - Merlyn Rees - who finally ended the policy.
So it is wrong for Mr Davis to at least hint that no British Government since Magna Carta has ever locked anyone up for six weeks without charge.
Internment seventies-style was draconian when compared with the sensible measures which were democratically approved this week after proper parliamentary and public debate and a whole series of safeguards incorporated to ensure protection of individual rights.
An absolute maximum 42-days detention in 'exceptional and extra-ordinary' individual cases, with regular scrutiny in the interests of the suspect is very different to simply rounding up hundreds of suspects, detaining them indefinitely without charge and then announcing the policy change.
But internment wasn't invented in 1971. It simply implemented long-standing legislation previously used by British Governments in almost every decade of the 20th Century.
In the 1950s and early 1960s, for example, 300 men were rounded up by security forces and detained without charge for an average of two years.
Two years is very different to 42 days.
I made my views clear both before the vote -
The answer is 42 - and in response to David Davis's
Bizarre stunt or as blogger Bob Piper more eloquently put it:
a cunning stunt.But David Cameron is reportedly spitting nails with David Davis's antics - and today's headlines show why.
Here's just a few...
Daily Telegraph -
Tensions with Cameron lay behind Davis resignation...Daily Mail -
Tories in turmoil..The Times -
...frustrated CameronThe Scotsman -
Tories ridiculed...And The Sun, who may run thir own candidate against Mr Davis -
Who Dares Whinges. Shadow Home Secretary and SAS reservist David Davis plunged a dagger into the heart of his party yesterday by quitting his job in a strop over Labour’s terror crackdown.BBC Political Editor Nick Robinson says when shocked Tory 'Leader' David Cameron said David Davis was
'courageous', it was parliamentary code for
'bonkers'.
Which coincidentally, is the very word David Davis admits that his wife used to describe his bizarre behaviour...